Skip Navigation

Separately Managed Accounts

Special Opportunities SMA

Overview

Inception
Date

12.31.2000

Account
Minimum

$100,000

Philosophy

Seek Long-Term Appreciation by Identifying Companies with:

  • Above Average Earnings Growth
  • Attractive Valuation
  • Strong Balance Sheets
  • Skilled Management
  • Above Average Return on Capital

Process

  • Internal Screens and External Sources Used to Identify Investment Candidates
  • Team-Based Approach to Fundamental Research
  • Valuation Assessed Relative to Historical Range, Industry Peers, Growth Rate, and the Market

Special Opportunities SMA

Management

View professional designations disclosures

Photo of Daniel  Morrall

Daniel Morrall

Co-Portfolio Manager

Photo of James  Curtis

James Curtis, CFA®

Co-Portfolio Manager

Performance

All Performance as of 06.30.2023

Term QTR YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Since Inception1
Special Opportunities SMA (Gross) 9.79 15.20 17.63 15.09 10.11 12.05 11.20
Special Opportunities SMA (Net) 9.00 13.54 14.24 11.76 6.92 8.81 7.97

The composite inception date is 12.31.2000. Effective 06.30.2023, the net of fee performance reflects the deduction of the maximum SMA bundled fee of 3.00% annually for all periods presented. Actual fees may vary by size and type of portfolio. Performance is preliminary and is annualized for periods longer than one year. Net of fees performance returns are presented net of the SMA bundled fee, which includes all charges for trading costs, advisory services, portfolio management, custody and other administrative fees. “Pure” Gross of fees performance returns do not reflect the deduction of any fees including trading costs: a client’s return will be reduced by the management fees and other expenses it may incur. Investment management fees are described in Sterling’s Form ADV 2A. Performance reflects the reinvestment of interest income and dividends and realized capital gains. The performance presented represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Performance is compared to an index: however, the volatility of an index varies greatly and investments cannot be made directly in an index. Market conditions vary from year to year and can result in a decline in market value due to material market or economic conditions. Sources: Russell Investments; Sterling Capital Management Analytics. Please refer to the GIPS Composite Report on the Fact Sheet linked above for additional disclosures.

Special Opportunities SMA

Materials

SMA

Insights

preview of document

09.21.2023 • Andrew Richman, CTFA

Fed Reiterates-Higher for Longer

While the Federal Reserve (Fed) met expectations with a pause/skip this meeting, the real story was the upward movement in both the Fed Funds rate this year and next year. The consensus is now for one more 25 basis point hike in 2023 with the Fed funds rate median at 5.60%.

preview of document

09.07.2023 • Shane Burke

An Updated Look at the FOMC and Yield Curve

An Updated Look at the FOMC and Yield Curve

09.06.2023 • Charles Wittmann, CFA®

The Lead - "Balancing Yield"

- One of the risks in seeking higher dividend yields in non-financial companies can be the increased balance sheet leverage that correlates with higher dividend yield. - For many companies, the cost of this leverage is rising with interest rates, potentially placing pressure on cash flows to pay future dividends as interest expense may take a greater share of corporate cash flow. - We believe that owning stocks with strong balance sheets has the potential to minimize this risk as we endeavor to generate attractive above-average total returns with below-average risk for clients.

preview of document

08.02.2023 • Andrew Richman, CTFA

Fitch Lowers Long-Term U.S. Debt Rating from AAA to AA+

Fitch Lowers Long-Term U.S. Debt Rating from AAA to AA+

08.01.2023 • Charles Wittmann, CFA®

The Lead - "Long-Term Dividends"

- What are the investing environment conditions that can cause dividend payers to lag on a short-term basis? - Looking back at Bloomberg data over the past twenty years, when dividend payers outperformed the Russell 1000 Value, non-earners underperformed and vice versa (56% of the time). - Over the twenty year period, dividend payer’s quarterly outperformance outweighed underperformance in contrast to non-earners. - In our quest to generate above-average returns with below-average risk for our clients, our approach is to take advantage of the long-term benefits of dividend payers that grow their dividends and seek to create value now and in the future.

preview of document

07.25.2023 • Andrew DiZio, CFA®

Real Estate Returns Following Fed Rate Hike Cycles

Over the last 15 months, the Federal Reserve (Fed) has meaningfully raised the benchmark fed funds rate in an effort to tamp down inflation. The Fed paused its hiking campaign during the June meeting, but issued an outlook suggesting additional rate increases are to be expected. Regardless of whether the Fed has finished raising rates, we believe the end of the tightening cycle is near and view now as a prudent time to examine the performance of Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) stocks following historical periods of fed funds increases.

Contact

Learn more about Sterling Capital solutions and services.

Scroll Up