Skip Navigation

Separately Managed Accounts

Intermediate Government/Credit A+ SMA

Overview

Inception
Date

12.31.2010

Account
Minimum

$250,000

Philosophy

  • Multi-faceted Process Adds Value
  • Conservative Approach to Fixed Income Management
  • Bond Market Inefficiencies Offer Opportunities for Selective Investors
  • Fundamental Research Drives Security Selection

Process

Top Down

  • Duration Management
  • Yield Curve Analysis
  • Sector Analysis

Bottom Up

  • Proprietary Analysis
  • Fundamental Research
  • Security Selection

Intermediate Government/Credit A+ SMA

Management

View professional designations disclosures

Photo of Mark Montgomery

Mark Montgomery, CFA®

Co-Portfolio Manager

Photo of Dow Taylor, Jr.

Dow Taylor, Jr., CFA®

Co-Portfolio Manager

Photo of Andrew Richman

Andrew Richman, CTFA

Co-Portfolio Manager

Photo of Justin Nicholson

Justin Nicholson

Co-Portfolio Manager

Performance

All Performance as of 03.31.2025

Term QTR YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Since Inception1
Intermediate Government/Credit A+ SMA (Gross) 2.32 2.32 5.57 2.33 1.11 1.98 2.37
Intermediate Government/Credit A+ SMA (Net) 1.94 1.94 4.02 0.82 -0.39 0.48 0.86
Bloomberg Intermediate Gov't/Credit A+ 2.45 2.45 5.50 2.00 0.38 1.59 1.95

1The performance inception date is 12.31.2010. The benchmark is the Bloomberg Intermediate Government/Credit A+ Index. Performance is preliminary and is annualized for periods longer than one year. Net of fees performance returns are presented net of the SMA bundled fee, which includes all charges for trading costs, advisory services, portfolio management, custody and other administrative fees. Gross of fees performance returns reflect the deduction of trading costs: a client’s return will be reduced by the management fees and other expenses it may incur. Investment management fees are described in SCM's Form ADV 2A. Performance reflects the reinvestment of interest income and dividends and realized capital gains. The performance presented represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Performance is compared to an index, however, the volatility of an index varies greatly and investments cannot be made directly in an index. Market conditions vary from year to year and can result in a decline in market value due to material market or economic conditions. Performance for periods greater than one year is annualized. Please refer to the GIPS Composite Report in the factsheet linked below for additional disclosures. Sources: Morningstar Direct; Sterling Capital Management Analytics.

Intermediate Government/Credit A+ SMA

Materials

SMA

Insights

07.02.2025 • Charles Wittmann, CFA®

The Lead - Redefining Value

- Why would several mega-cap stocks that have been classified as 100% growth in the past be classified, even partially, in value?
- FTSE Russell uses an objective style and methodology that splits the Russell 1000® Index into growth and value based primarily on earnings growth, sales growth, and price-to-book measures (the last reconstitution was June 27, 2025).
- We discuss the reasons for these changes and why they occurred.
- We are aware of the changes, and our focus remains committed to the same process and mandate that has stood for decades.

06.20.2025 • Andrew Richman, CTFA

Fed Well-Positioned to Wait

Andy Richman's update on the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

06.10.2025 • Charles Wittmann, CFA®

The Lead - Quality on Sale

- Our investment philosophy focuses on quality.
- What has made the last three months unusual is the underperformance of quality stocks in the market downturn this spring.
- We discuss how quality has differentiated properties that tend to outperform in bear markets and over the long term.
- We then discuss how the underperformance of quality in the recent negative return market, when historically it outperforms, resulted in “quality on sale” for active investors with a quality orientation.

Decorative image showing green covered columns in a sunlit tiled hallway.

05.07.2025 • Charles Wittmann, CFA®

The Lead - Follow the Money

- We believe the inputs that create the ability for a company to pay dividends is of critical importance, especially if the economic environment becomes challenging.
- Starting in the later part of 2024, aggregate Bloomberg estimated earnings for the S&P 500® Index began to moderate then decline.
- While dividend payout ratios have improved, we would note that the rate of the market’s dividend growth has fallen almost 50%, to mid-single digits, since 2022.
- We believe more tempered growth expectations and companies signaling greater caution by moderating their commitment to return cash to shareholders via dividends is our sign to remain vigilant on the fundamental sources that generate dividend growth.

Decorative image of 3D paper pyramids in white and blue on a teal background.

04.03.2025 • Charles Wittmann, CFA®

The Lead - Resilient Quality

- Economic sectors associated with value stocks, such as industrials and financials, have seen their quality measurements improve.
- With slowing economic growth and persistent inflation leading to “stagflation” concerns, what type of equity investments tend to shine?
- We show how quality companies that pay dividends and repurchase their shares have differentiated themselves in similar periods.

Decorative image of modern glass and steel building with a curved, wave-like design.

03.21.2025 • Andrew Richman, CTFA

Fed Lowers Growth Outlook But Raises Inflation Expectations

Andy Richman's update on the March Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

Contact

Learn more about Sterling Capital solutions and services.

Scroll Up
Contact UsScroll Up